以下文字与答案无关
提示:有些试题内容 显示不完整,文字错误 或者 答案显示错误等问题,这是由于我们在扫描录入过程中 机器识别错误导致,人工逐条矫正总有遗漏,所以恳请 广大网友理解。
Which of the following would NOT be a sufficient basis for admitting the letter into evidence?
选项: A:Comparison by the trier of fact of the letter with an admitted signature of the defendant.
B:Evidence that the letter was written in response to one written by the plaintiff to the defendant.
C:Opinion testimony of a non-expert witness based upon familiarity acquired to authenticate the signature.
D:Testimony by the plaintiff that she is familiar with the defendant's signature and recognizes it on the letter.
The ledger was admitted into evidence. The defendant seeks to testify to her memory of much larger amounts she had given the plaintiff.
Is the defendant's testimony admissible or inadmissible?
选项: A:Admissible, because it is based on the defendant's firsthand knowledge.
B:Admissible, because the ledger entries offered by a party-opponent opened the door.
C:Inadmissible, because the defendant's failure to challenge the accuracy of the ledger constituted an adoptive admission.
D:Inadmissible, because the ledger is the best evidence of the amounts the plaintiff received.