请在 下方输入 要搜索的题目:

How do the criteria for beneficial ownership differ between sanctions and anti-money laundering due diligence (SDD) in the United States?Most of the anti-money laundering provisions of the
选项:

A: A set the criterion of beneficial owner as owning more than 20% of a legal entity.OFAC, on the other hand, uses the 45% standard in sanctions due diligence (SDD).Most of the anti-money laundering provisions of the
B: B set the criterion of beneficial owner as owning more than 25% of a legal entity.The US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) uses the "50% rule" in sanctions due diligence.Most of the anti-money laundering provisions of the
C: C set the criterion of beneficial owner as owning more than 75% of a legal entity.The US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), on the other hand, uses the 25% standard in sanctions due diligence.Most of the anti-money laundering provisions of the
D: D set the criterion of beneficial owner as owning more than 50% of a legal entity.The US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), on the other hand, uses the 25% standard in sanctions due diligence.

发布时间:2024-06-03 10:58:36
推荐参考答案 ( 由 搜题小帮手 官方老师解答 )
联系客服
答案:

以下文字与答案无关

提示:有些试题内容 显示不完整,文字错误 或者 答案显示错误等问题,这是由于我们在扫描录入过程中 机器识别错误导致,人工逐条矫正总有遗漏,所以恳请 广大网友理解。

相关试题
登录 - 搜题小帮手
点我刷新
立即注册
注册 - 搜题小帮手
点我刷新
立即登录